For twelve years now, I've been a carer for my mum who has dementia, and for ten of that twelve years I have had carers coming to the house. I've had several different organisations come, and so I know that home support is a bit of a curate's egg. Good in parts and absolutely rank in others. Amongst those experiences was a very brief brush with Domiciliary Care. I won't go into details, but I suffice to say that I was not in the least surprised to see them appear in a half hour investigative programme filmed by the BBC.
To be fair to Domiciliary Care, the faults that were revealed could be found in any care organisation. Saying you'd been half an hour when you'd only been ten minutes; giving people sandwiches instead of a proper meal (and Quavers); not knowing how to move and handle or how to use a hoist, turning up late; these things happen to a greater or lesser degree in all care organisations. It was the sheer unremitting extent of Domiciliary Care's failings that made it the bogeyman of poor service. At the root of this malaise was South Lanarkshire's auction system for the care contract in their area. All those tendering had to log on to a webpage and the company that bid the lowest got the contract. Corners were cut and the service suffered as a result.
Step forward Arifa Farooq, investigative journalist for the Beeb. She went undercover as an employee of Domiciliary Care and unsurprisingly, did not state on her CV that she was a journalist. Last week she was arrested for providing false personal details. The NUJ are backing her and so are the BBC, but she is part of a growing trend of the persecution of whistleblowers in the area of elderly care. Remember Margaret Haywood? She was the nurse that filmed undercover for Panorama in an elderly ward to expose the abuse going on. She was struck off the nursing register for filming patients without their permission. The fact that she asked their permission to show the footage before it was broadcast cut no ice with the nursing board; she was sacked and without registration she will not be able to work in nursing again. Then there was Dr Rita Pal, who exposed abuse going on in an elderly hospital ward in North Staffordshire NHS trust. Her reward for that was ten years of persecution through the courts of the GMC. It's still not over and she is now working as a GP.
One could laugh at the sheer pettiness of the rage of these jobsworths. I laughed out loud when Arifa Farooq revealed that 'Lady' Mary Beattie who is the head of Domiciliary Care is in fact nothing of the sort; Burke's Peerage had no record of her honorific title. (I also thought Farooq would pay for putting in that detail and I wasn't wrong.) At the same time the sheer violence of the reaction to anyone exposing the faults in elderly care is disturbing. It is par for the course for jobsworths to try and trip up whistleblowers; it is not usual for them to succeed, as they did with Margaret Haywood and Rita Pal. I am keeping my fingers crossed for Arifa Farooq and I am hoping the fact that she is a journalist rather than a medic will protect her. In the meantime, it's a rough old world out there for whistleblowers,but we need them. It's time we gave them proper protection.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
12 comments:
I very much hope that she gets the credit she deserves for drawing attention to the appalling practices rather than face prosecution.
Please tell us where Dr Rita Pal is working as a GP. I'm sure she deserves all the recognition she can get.
I doubt that Rita Pal can be working as a GP as she is not registered for some 'administrative reason'.
Here's her entry on the GMC web site:
4528472
Rita Pal
Woman Not Registered - Administrative Reason 1998
Anonymous,
I stand corrected. Rita Pal is not registered due to non payment of her fees, as she states on her own site. I thought she was working as a GP but obviously she is not, no doubt due to the battle she has been fighting for the past ten years. What I am trying to work out about you is a) why are you sitting with a copy of the GMC register on your lap b) if you are so pernickity in checking GPs' registration, why did you not go one step further and check the 'administrative reason' for Rita Pal's non registration? Are you perhaps one of those who spread the rumour that she was actually struck off?
Thank you nonetheless for providing a striking example of the kind of person that whistleblowers are up against.
Hi Julie,
Thanks for the mention. It was very kind of you.
Few people are aware of the impact of whistleblowing. A summary can be found here - scroll down to the bottom Summary
Essentially, the GMC has harassed me since I whistleblew subjecting me to one vexatious complaint after another. The last complaint was cleared in 2007. I was never struck off, there was no finding against me. I am not fond of spending my life in front of a keyboard fighting revolving door complaints about petty things such as
1. A typographical error. Resulted in a 2 year investigation unknown to me by the GMC.
2. Material I had written critical of doctors on the internet. The GMC took a complaint up stating I had defamed them. In 2007 they then told me they did not have the powers to try defamation.
3. Finally in 2007, they instigated the loss of my job due to a link I had made to a post on the internet. Apparently, I had breached the confidentiality of a public document and the person who had agreed to its publication. The second aspect was to try me for calling myself a psychiatrist. Apparently, I was one according to every reference, every hospital and the department of health. Even the GMC called me a psychiatrist but they had to try me for 6 months to see if I was one. I was eventually cleared.
The GMC fees were not paid because they had me fired from my job and I subsequently lost my references. Anyone can therefore come to their own conclusions. There is no mystery about the reason I am off the register. Any person with a rational mind can work out why that is.
I hope this assists. I suspect the those who made the final complaint were responsible for the post above.
Sorry about the long explanation. I do like your website, it is exvellent
Dr Rita Pal
http://www.nhsexposed.com
http://www.ward87.blogspot.com
http://www.nhsexposedblog.blogspot.com
Hi Dr Rita,
Thanks for dropping by and for the explanation.I'm just sorry that someone of your integrity is being hassled for doing the right thing. It reminds me of Swift's comment;
'When a true genius appears in the world you shall know them by this sign; that the dunces are all in confederacy against him.'
Take heart and don't let the b*** get you down.
I am the second anonymous.
I wasn't wishing to imply anything except that you must be have been wrong about Rita's work as she is not registered. The GMC register is readily accessible on line and the details are word for word what is on the online register. I would think from what Rita says that 'administrative reason' in her case at least means that the fees were not paid.
Dr Rita Pal should appeal her sacking, pay her GMC subscription and get back into hands-on medicine. Her unmitigated support for other unjustly treated and struck-off doctors, Professor David Southall in particular, tells us just how much her particular cause and her wider ones were justified.
Panorama should do her story next.
'I wasn't meaning to imply anything'
I believe you - thousands wouldn't. I repeat- if you are just a passing tourist on this blog and have not heard of Dr Rita, why of all the things you would choose to look up about her, would you look up her registration? And why didn't you check the registration code to find out what she had been removed for? Instead you leave your comment open to interpretation and do the same with this one by saying,
I would think from what Rita says that 'administrative reason' in her case at least means that the fees were not paid.'
At least? What does that mean? You sure know the difference between an implied and actual slur. Afraid of being charged with libel, anonymous?
Ah Mr (or Ms) anonymous,
So you've broken cover at last. I'm not publishing your latest comment,but I am sending a copy of it, your ISP number and location to Dr Rita, and she can do with it what she pleases. Never heard of Statcounter I take it..
Julie
I think you raise far more valid issues about the NHS today than the above debate about my GMC registration. Millions of doctors the world over are doctors without a GMC registration. It isn't the definitive to "being" a doctor or a person. It is just that some of those who are narrow minded assume it is. I note that anon above assumes that I have something to conceal when I must be the most open doctor with extracts of my adventures with the GMC and others strewn all over the internet. There is nothing secret about it.
By the way, I was a carer for my disabled father for many years until 2005. Not a lot of people know that. It is incredibly difficult and you do an admirable job and I recall having the infamous debate with the PCT about incontinence pads. There was a view that incontinence pads had to be rationed to 3 a day. I was asked to reuse them if they did not fill the recommended 800 mls. I then suggested that the local Chief Executive and the entire Trust board wear said pads until the recommended 800 mls were filled. I told them that they could happily sit in their own "piss". Apparently, that didn't go down well and the next day I had a supply for my elderly father after a 3 year fight. On his funeral day they delivered 3 box fulls and left them outside our house.
Keep up the good work Julie. I think your blog is so much better than debating irrelevant issues such as my registration. If I pay the GMC a hefty £700, I should be back on the Register with all the rights for them to harass me yet again - probably for my chocolate addiction or the way I write in a certain "Tone", or the way I wear my hair or the way I wear pink. It is now open season for them. Being a whistleblower gives them further rights to discredit what I have done. As a whistleblower you only have a few things left - your credibility or whatever is left of it and your self respect. Steve Bolsin went to Australia. I have no intention of leaving England.
Dr Rita Pal
Having been a part of the Online Universal Work Marketing team for 4 months now, I’m thankful for my fellow team members who have patiently shown me the ropes along the way and made me feel welcome
www.onlineuniversalwork.com
Post a Comment